I’m totally gonna start putting hotter pics on my flickr
Stamped: March 2nd, 2007 | Toggle Similar
Tagged: body parts, hot sex, sex talk.
On February 14th Wired wrote a story about a guy who took a picture of woman taking a picture in Japan (got that?). Well the guy put it up on his flickr page and friend of the woman recognized her. Then she left him a comment and linked to the picture she was taking when he took his picture. Next thing you know they meet up and fall in love.
Love web 2.0 style may be cool but I still get nauseous when I hear mushy mushy lovey dovey shit.
I'd much rather talk about sex.
So, I came across this crazy picture of two people having sex from inside an MRI machine. This is where it's at. I mean a nice artistic picture of a woman's tattooed back and subsequent love story is nice and all but this rocks. Though it's kinda crazy, look at her uterus! I had no idea the uterus was so backward tilted. I always pictured it like an upside-down pear sitting directly above my love chute. At least that's what it feels like when some guy is pounding senselessly away at me while I'm saying, "Would you mind slowing down? I think your hitting my uterus cause that hurts." And case in point, look at his reach. He's way up in there. Personally, I'm thinking ouch…but I'm also thinking, "That's kinda hot." One of my male friends said, "It looks like pinball." And I'm inclined to agree.

Is there something wrong with me that I'm getting turned on by an MRI?
I think I like this so much because it demystifies the sex act. After all it's just a penis inside a vagina and the meeting of the two causes great pleasure. Why we gotta call it something else? Like making love, or freakynasty. It's not love nor nasty…it's sex, people. And any inkling of love you may feel will dissipate immediately following orgasm.
I hate to disappoint but I don't have any MRI sex pics of myself. I guess for now all I can do is put up pictures from my last dental exam taken approximately 2 hours before giving a blowjob. Use your imagination.

Last 5 posts by Meme
- Mama don't Preach - May 18th, 2007
- You don't have to Fuck Me twice to get the point across - May 11th, 2007
- Update: Newsworthy? - May 4th, 2007
- Nipples, Pasties and Lesbians - April 27th, 2007
- Vagina! - April 20th, 2007


Yes.
Hey Meme! I’d have to get out my old sex-n-anatomy books (actually I ought to get those out anyway) but I’m pretty sure there are two things going on. First, most anatomical drawings are done from the front so the uterus might just be foreshortened in those. Next, I know that internal organs around your pelvis rearrange themselves during arousal to make room for the penis — something they’re *definitely* not doing when the old anatomists were digging around drawing pictures…
Which brings up another point. Evidently a lot of what we don’t know about, say, the clitoris is because anatomists studied cadavers — often of elderly people — instead of live ones. The researchers who took that MRI (in, like, 1992 I think) and Dr. Helen O’Connell (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5013866.stm) had the novel idea of studying actual live, sexually active women. And they’re discovering all kinds of cool stuff.
Something else fun about that photo? Look how much of the cock is inside the man’s body. It sort of makes sense since there has to be something anchoring them to get them to stand up like that. But evidently most anatomists didn’t really register that either.
By the way, you look wonderful in x-rays.
Take care,
figleaf
I was going to say you look wonderful in xray too.
Hey Figleaf,
It’s amazing to me how little I know about my own body. In fact I was reading the other day about a sort of lighted speculum you can buy and someone can get a good look all up in there and I got excited. Going to an ObGyn is one thing, cause they tend to be very vague and speak in what seem to be metaphors but having an untrained eye scoping me out I think would be very well, eye opening. Any takers?